\r"; ?> http://kitblog.com/notes/2008/08/beautiful_ambiguity.html Kit·Blog Notes — Comments on “Beautiful ambiguity” en Cristian -Kit- Paul Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:42:50 +0200 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=5.031 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 1. On 12 Aug 2008, 10:42 AM, Eugen Erhan wrote: ]]> <p>building schmilding.<br /> i LOVE the name CCTV, it says it all.<br /> if i may attempt a slogan - </p> <p>CCTV<br /> since 1984</p> Any thoughts? Reply to this comment.
Too narrow? Subscribe to global comments feed.

]]> seed('Beautiful ambiguity', 'http://kitblog.com/notes/2008/08/beautiful_ambiguity.html#comment-727'); ?> Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:42:50 +0200 2. On 12 Aug 2008, 4:59 PM, Kit wrote: ]]> <p>Speaking of—, see a variation on this media thingie in the <a href="http://kitblog.com/notes/2008/08/shame_1.html">next note</a>.</p> <p>But.</p> <blockquote><p>So, like the Olympic Stadium’s architects Herzog &amp; De Meuron before him, Scheeren excuses his engagement with a country vilified for its human rights record, by his faith in transforming it.</p></blockquote> Any thoughts? Reply to this comment.
Too narrow? Subscribe to global comments feed.

]]> seed('Beautiful ambiguity', 'http://kitblog.com/notes/2008/08/beautiful_ambiguity.html#comment-728'); ?> Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:59:41 +0200 3. On 12 Aug 2008, 5:50 PM, Gulbin wrote: ]]> <p>horrible building design</p> Any thoughts? Reply to this comment.
Too narrow? Subscribe to global comments feed.

]]> seed('Beautiful ambiguity', 'http://kitblog.com/notes/2008/08/beautiful_ambiguity.html#comment-729'); ?> Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:50:58 +0200