\r"; ?> http://kitblog.com/notes/2009/11/new_aol_id.html Kit·Blog Notes — Comments on “New AOL ID” en Cristian -Kit- Paul Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:18:26 +0200 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=5.031 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 1. On 24 Nov 2009, 8:18 AM, dragos wrote: ]]> <p>pai... ma asteptam sa bagi un insight sau macar sa zici ca-i misto sau nu :-) pen' ca techies l-au luat la misto big time si pot intelege foarte bine de ce. cumva insa cred ca nu au acces decat la o parte din poveste</p> Any thoughts? Reply to this comment.
Too narrow? Subscribe to global comments feed.

]]> seed('New AOL ID', 'http://kitblog.com/notes/2009/11/new_aol_id.html#comment-1180'); ?> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:18:26 +0200 2. On 24 Nov 2009, 2:27 PM, Kit wrote: ]]> <p>While bloggers might get away with it, a like/dislike approach is exactly what I find inappropriate in high-profile cases like this when it comes from the press or industry experts. I'd call it <em>business tabloidization</em>. Let's wait and see how it works, how they're going to use it.</p> <p>We only know what they want us to in this process, and some of the real issues they're addressing with this will remain locked in their research and board-room presentations.</p> <p>Re techies reaction—imagine Google unveiling its current identity today. Childish, analog, lo-tech, not representative for the company's dimension, strength or technological cutting edge etc. Can you picture the reactions, especially with the bloggers and the techies?</p> Any thoughts? Reply to this comment.
Too narrow? Subscribe to global comments feed.

]]> seed('New AOL ID', 'http://kitblog.com/notes/2009/11/new_aol_id.html#comment-1182'); ?> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:27:52 +0200